Criminal Defense Attorneys Win big in Chicago

 

Chicago Criminal Defense Lawyer Wins Cases

 

MOVEMENT TO SUPPRESS GRANTED – CLASS X FELONY NARCOTICS Charge REJECTED

When police go into somebody’s house without a search warrant, the presumption is that such an entrance is prohibited. Under many situations, any kind of proof took as a result of that type of access will certainly be “reduced”. That generally suggests that the instance can’t be prosecuted even more as well as will be dismissed said Robert Callahan – criminal lawyers in Chicago

In a recent instance, the Supreme Court outlined how the Constitution secures every U.S. person from illegal searches and seizures. The court specified: “The principal wickedness against which the Fourth Amendment is guided is physical access right into the house.” Click here for more information about top criminal defense attorney chicago

Our newest dismissal is a prime example of how heavy handed search strategies by authorities could sometimes backfire on them. A huge quantity of cocaine, euphoria as well as marijuana were all ruled inadmissible as a result of a warrantless entry right into an apartment. Call Robert J. Callahan – a lawyers

In 2015 authorities responded to a sound problem at an apartment or condo on the north side of Chicago. It was evident that a party was taking place when the officers knocked on the door. When NT answered the door, officers might scent a strong odor of melting marijuana originating from within. They asked NT to transform the music down, and he claimed he would promptly. NT then aimed to shut the door. One of the policemans stuck his first step, and forced his method right into the apartment. Inside they recovered over 200 ecstasy pills, a number of pounds of marijuana, as well as over 50 grams of cocaine from NT’s pocket.

We filed a movement to suppress proof and the court conducted a hearing in May 2017.

During the hearing, the policeman indicated that he never put his foot in the door. He said that after smelling cannabis, he merely “poked his head inside” and also gazed down the hall. He claimed he then saw several mason containers having marijuana. Therefore, he positioned NT under arrest as well as searched the home.

It is not unusual for policemans to reduce misbehavior and even lie to try to legitimize a poor (unconstitutional) arrest. With great prep work, study, as well as sound interrogation, we can normally defeat such behavior, which’s exactly what occurred below.

The court agreed with our analysis of the Constitutional legislation. We said that even “jabbing your head inside” was a violation versus the fourth amendment as well as NT’s civil liberties. The judge subdued all the confiscated proof as well as the case was rejected.